Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-16 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3272 HB 412 Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 5 : Page 23, line 25: Under: Allocations Habitat Delete 1,091,500 Insert 1,339,000 Page 23, line 26: Under: Allocations Special Projects Delete 959,200 Insert 1,060,100 Page 23, line 27: Under: Allocations Habitat Permitting/Title 16 Delete 2,281,000 Insert 2,315,000 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Objections were heard. President Pearce called the Senate. The call was satisfied. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3273 HB 412 Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 6 : Page 17, line 27: Under: Appropriation General Institutions Item Fund Delete 102,083,900 96,855,100 Insert 103,637,800 98,409,000 Page 18, delete line 21. Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 6. Senator Frank objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 6 failed. Senator Lincoln offered Amendment No. 7 : Page 18, line 22 Under: Appropriation General Community Corrections Item Fund Delete 19,802,400 19,802,400 Insert 20,297,700 20,297,700 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3274 HB 412 Page 18, line 31 Under: Allocations Point MacKenzie Delete 2,029,100 Insert 2,139,700 Page 18, delete line 33. Senator Lincoln moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 7. Objections were heard. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent to divide the question. Senator Donley moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw his motion. Without objection, it was so ordered. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 7 failed. Senator Duncan offered Amendment No. 8 : Page 2, line 4: Delete 70,000,000 Insert 50,000,000 Senator Duncan moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 8. Senator Miller objected. 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3275 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 8 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 9 : Insert 2% unallocated general fund reduction to the following Departments: Department of Administration Department of Community and Regional Affairs Department of Commerce and Economic Development Department of Environmental Conservation Department of Fish and Game Department of Law (except Criminal Law Divison for Prosecutors Office) Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Department of Health and Social Services Department of Natural Resources Department of Revenue Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 9. Senator Duncan objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3276 HB 412 SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Leman, Taylor, Torgerson Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Zharoff Halford changed from "Yea" to "Nay". R.Phillips changed from "Yea" to "Nay". Taylor changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, Amendment No. 9 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 10 : Under: Violent Crimes Compensation Board Delete 1,182,800 Insert 1,482,800 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 10. Senator Rieger objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 10 failed. 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3277 HB 412 Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 11 : Under: Public Defender Agency Delete 8,311,800 Insert 8,253,100 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 11. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley, Green, Halford, Leman, Taylor Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Hoffman, Kelly, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Torgerson, Zharoff Taylor changed from "Nay" to "Yea". and so, Amendment No. 11 failed. Senator Donley offered Amendment No. 12 : Under: General Funds Division of Insurance Delete 3,978,000 Insert 3,953,000 Under: General Funds Division of Trade & Development Delete 2,102,800 Insert 2,127,800 Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 12. Senator Frank objected. 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3278 HB 412 The question being: Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 1 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Donley Nays: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Frank, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly, Leman, Lincoln, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson, Zharoff Adams changed from "Yea" to "Nay". and so, Amendment No. 12 failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 13 : Page 22, lines 19 and 20: Under: Allocations Fisheries Management Delete 25,728,800 Insert 25,729,261 Fisheries Development Delete 3,645,600 Insert 3,745,600 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 13. Objections were heard. Senator Hoffman moved and asked unanimous consent to amend Amendment No. 13 as follows: Change 25,729,261 to 26,028,800 Without objection, Amendment No. 13 was amended. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 13 as amended be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3279 HB 412 SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 as amended YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 13 as amended failed. Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 14 : Page 21, line 32: Under: Allocations Seafood and Sanitation Inspections Delete 2,872,000 Insert 2,948,900 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 14. Objections were heard. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 14 failed. 1996-04-16 Senate Journal Page 3280 HB 412 Senator Hoffman offered Amendment No. 15 : Page 23, line 2: Under: Allocations Wildlife Conservation Delete 13,016,000 Insert 14,926,300 Senator Hoffman moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 15. Senator Sharp objected. The question being: Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted? The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 412(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 13 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Duncan, Ellis, Hoffman, Lincoln, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Donley, Frank, Green, Halford, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, R.Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor, Torgerson and so, Amendment No. 15 failed.